On 2/10/2015, I received a voicemail from Mr. White of US Litigation Services stating they were going to sign off on something because I had not responded to a 10-day notice. I have never received a 10-day notice for anything so I called the number back. I spoke to James Tate who had my social security number, bank account number and driver's license number. He did have the wrong address.
James Tate said I had written a check to pay for a loan off a closed account on 5/21/2012. He said I was going to have criminal charges brought against me. After explaining to him that I had not lived at the address they have for over 10 years, he said he would email me a copy of the documents they attempted to mail to me. He asked me to call him back for resolution because I owe $630+.
I never received an email yesterday but today I did get another voicemail from a similar number. The voicemail was from James Tate but this time he stated the company was United Litigation Service (similar but different). I'm filing a police report tonight. I have already filed a report with the FCC.
Don't know yet what to make of this company...if it is a company at all! A Mr. White called today and left a voice mail for me stating that some kind of 10 day state mandated form had not been responded to by us, and therefore, unless we contacted this guy immediately, he would presume us to be "non-cooperative" and "move forward," whatever that is supposed to mean.
So I sent a reply voice mail to this outfit, and when the phone at their end was answered, it stated I would be called back immediately. I was not called back.
Their initial message stated, in addition to some kind of statement about some 10 day state mandated letter to us, that we had a case number, but the message did not indicate what that alleged case number was, specifically. When I called this number back, it stated that I was to leave name, phone number, and case number. Since I have no idea what the case number was, I told them in my reply voice mail that I didn't have any alleged case number.
In my reply voice mail, I also told them that I was not responsible for any letters sent to me unless the sender had asked for proof of delivery, and I had not received any letters where the post office had asked me to sign for the letter. Beyond that, I told them, THEY were responsible for ensuring I actually received mail they had sent...that I could not be held responsible for receipt of mail, unless it was mail I did have to sign for.
I told them in my reply voice mail that just because they have some record of having sent mail to us, that does not constiute any fact of our having received it, unless it was mail we actually had to sign for. I asked if they had received any signature from us proving actual delivery of anything they had sent, and if they didn't have any proof, they could not hold us responsible for receipt of anything they had sent; reminding them that mail can be lost, delivered to the wrong address, and so on. Again I stressed that THEY are responsible for ensuring any receipt of mail they send; not the recipient.
We shall see what they have to say tomorrow, should they call again. But already I have found scam alerts on other web sites about this outfit...which tells me I am likely right about my feelings that this company, like the company operating under the name of "Enhanced Acquisitions" or "Executive Acquisitions" is a scam outfit.
My husband asks why these people don't get real jobs. I replied to him that they can't because all the real jobs in America have been offshored.
But if they, like "Enhanced Acquisitions" which I have already dealt with, is trying to collect money from us that we do not owe, THEY are the ones committing fraud; not us, and I will tell them so when I next have to talk with them.
United Litigation Services Reviews
On 2/10/2015, I received a voicemail from Mr. White of US Litigation Services stating they were going to sign off on something because I had not responded to a 10-day notice. I have never received a 10-day notice for anything so I called the number back. I spoke to James Tate who had my social security number, bank account number and driver's license number. He did have the wrong address.
James Tate said I had written a check to pay for a loan off a closed account on 5/21/2012. He said I was going to have criminal charges brought against me. After explaining to him that I had not lived at the address they have for over 10 years, he said he would email me a copy of the documents they attempted to mail to me. He asked me to call him back for resolution because I owe $630+.
I never received an email yesterday but today I did get another voicemail from a similar number. The voicemail was from James Tate but this time he stated the company was United Litigation Service (similar but different). I'm filing a police report tonight. I have already filed a report with the FCC.
Don't know yet what to make of this company...if it is a company at all! A Mr. White called today and left a voice mail for me stating that some kind of 10 day state mandated form had not been responded to by us, and therefore, unless we contacted this guy immediately, he would presume us to be "non-cooperative" and "move forward," whatever that is supposed to mean.
So I sent a reply voice mail to this outfit, and when the phone at their end was answered, it stated I would be called back immediately. I was not called back.
Their initial message stated, in addition to some kind of statement about some 10 day state mandated letter to us, that we had a case number, but the message did not indicate what that alleged case number was, specifically. When I called this number back, it stated that I was to leave name, phone number, and case number. Since I have no idea what the case number was, I told them in my reply voice mail that I didn't have any alleged case number.
In my reply voice mail, I also told them that I was not responsible for any letters sent to me unless the sender had asked for proof of delivery, and I had not received any letters where the post office had asked me to sign for the letter. Beyond that, I told them, THEY were responsible for ensuring I actually received mail they had sent...that I could not be held responsible for receipt of mail, unless it was mail I did have to sign for.
I told them in my reply voice mail that just because they have some record of having sent mail to us, that does not constiute any fact of our having received it, unless it was mail we actually had to sign for. I asked if they had received any signature from us proving actual delivery of anything they had sent, and if they didn't have any proof, they could not hold us responsible for receipt of anything they had sent; reminding them that mail can be lost, delivered to the wrong address, and so on. Again I stressed that THEY are responsible for ensuring any receipt of mail they send; not the recipient.
We shall see what they have to say tomorrow, should they call again. But already I have found scam alerts on other web sites about this outfit...which tells me I am likely right about my feelings that this company, like the company operating under the name of "Enhanced Acquisitions" or "Executive Acquisitions" is a scam outfit.
My husband asks why these people don't get real jobs. I replied to him that they can't because all the real jobs in America have been offshored.
But if they, like "Enhanced Acquisitions" which I have already dealt with, is trying to collect money from us that we do not owe, THEY are the ones committing fraud; not us, and I will tell them so when I next have to talk with them.