This Defendant METROPOLITAN EDISON better known by MET-ED is being sued for conspiring with the police and fBI to break into my home, Violations in the 4th and 14th amendments of the constitution .As I said earlier on in my reports the FBI aren't as of yet named as a party to my Civil Action pending in the Appeals Court 2nd Department case no.(14-907).
Heres what they did , on the night of the last Tornado storm that we were effected by the power went out in my area for about 24hrs and then restored. At the time Saint Joseph hospital had denied me to see a doctor on two occasions. Heres what they did , they gave me an appointment a day or two later figuring I would be desperate to go and about 4 to 6 hours before the appointment cut the power off to drain my alarm back-up battery so the FBI would gain entry, in order to look for the tape Recorders. Since ,I was aware of what they were up to I stood home. I reported the outage to the public utility commission which investigated the complaint and the defendant responded that they do not know why the power went out again after it was restored. I was send this in writing by one of the workers there that did not much care for what they were doing but in fear blocked out her name from the report to avoid getting in trouble over it. Earlier on this week at 2:00 am they powered off the electricity again as intimidation for the last report I wrote.
Fraudulent ORDERS: In this part I want to discuss fraudulent orders, because they write them and try to make the public think its law or act as if they don’t know any better or just do it because prose litigants are supposed to be to dum to read and understand the interpretation of law.
Judge Mauskopf, what is a substantial Right, well here the Supreme court Stated that it has been definitely stated to bring up children is a substantial right under the 14th amendment.
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S.564(1972)"While this Court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty guaranteed [by the Fourteenth Amendment], the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint, but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privilege long recognized as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.
Fuller v. Fuller 13So.3d1108 (Fla.5th DCA 2009) the court stated: "If substantial evidence does not support the factual finds then the court abused its discretion, A parent has a constitutionally protected inherent right to a meaningful relationship with his or her children., and must be treated equally under all of the 4th 9th and 14th Amendments to the United States of America". "There is no reason to excuse the judiciary participating in depriving the parents of the care and custody time with their children.
So first, the Kings Family Court Judge deprives me of my child, in a strong arm attempt to force me into giving the court jurisdiction and now the district court is going to continue depriving me my child to force me into giving up my suit against the judge who alienated me from my son. How American is that!
Going back to the Appellate Courts decision to extend an order that the court lacked subject matter trial. If your read the order in my drop box you will notice these judges used the same fraudulent case made up by the lawyer and judge that framed me ,posted it online Richardson vs. Richardson,80 AD3d 32(2010)so the public would think it’s a real case to make it look like the judge's acts weren’t in bad faith in holding trial without jurisdiction, when it was a deliberate act to defraud. Don’t be fooled, its not a real case its made up to appear like there is a question over law. When the real question here is fraud, and more fraud. The judges that ordered this Skelos J.P.,Lott Roman and Laslle JJ.
Next the New York state court of Appeals, I called them to file an order to show cause to stay the Appellate courts order. They tell me that they don’t do order to show cause Exparte and I would have to serve the defendant first before sending it to the court. So after I go through the trouble as they instruct me they tell me the judge declined to sign the order. If you want to ask for a stay pending appeal your going to have to do it by motion. Now that they have the motion their telling me its going to take six to eight weeks to decide the motion.
Like I said in my previous report they all act in collusion. Lucky for me im not suing a Federal judge I surely be dead by now or being held in jail without trial like they did that attorney in California Richard Fine, made him a political prisoner for exploiting judicial corruption. It’s a shame because these parties give a bad name for the good law biding judges that are out there. Ive had my share of meeting both.
Article VI of the New York Constitution explicitly states process may executed in any part of the state. It don’t say in any state or country.
[Unified court system; organization; process]
Section 1. a. There shall be a unified court system for the state. The state-wide courts shall consist of the court of appeals, the supreme court including the appellate divisions thereof, the court of claims, the county court, the surrogate's court and the family court, as hereinafter provided. The legislature shall establish in and for the city of New York, as part of the unified court system for the state, a single, city-wide court of civil jurisdiction and a single, city-wide court of criminal jurisdiction, as hereinafter provided, and may upon the request of the mayor and the local legislative body of the city of New York, merge the two courts into one city-wide court of both civil and criminal jurisdiction. The unified court system for the state shall also include the district, town, city and village courts outside the city of New York, as hereinafter provided.
b. The court of appeals, the supreme court including the appellate divisions thereof, the court of claims, the county court, the surrogate's court, the family court, the courts or court of civil and criminal jurisdiction of the city of New York, and such other courts as the legislature may determine shall be courts of record.
c. All processes, warrants and other mandates of the court of appeals, the supreme court including the appellate divisions thereof, the court of claims, the county court, the surrogate's court and the family court may be served and executed in any part of the state. All processes, warrants and other mandates of the courts or court of civil and criminal jurisdiction of the city of New York may, subject to such limitation as may be prescribed by the legislature, be served and executed in any part of the state. The legislature may provide that processes, warrants and other mandates of the district court may be served and executed in any part of the state and that processes, warrants and other mandates of town, village and city courts outside the city of New York may be served and executed in any part of the county in which such courts are located or in any part of any adjoining county.
Title iii of the United States Constitution Section 2: in part states,The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed;
New York Family Court Act § 154. (c)(1) states, that the family court can issue a order protection so long as: (1) the act or acts giving rise to the application for issuance or enforcement of the order of protection occurred within the state.
So here you have the united states constitution and new York constitution and the family court act all states the courts jurisdiction is within the state and these four judges in New York are issuing orders of protections and holding trial for offenses alleged in Pennsylvania. Congress needs to take action again against these judges that break the law willfully, and they do it more so because I am Hispanic, with limited knowledge of the law and limited money to litigate. The truth be told they never expected I could write an appeal or represent myself in a court of law and now that they see I can its become a problem for them because of what I can prove in a court of law in front of a jury.
Lastly, im going to close this report with these last words. As the ex-chief Ted Gunderson of the FBI on you tube before talking about conspiracies "Im not anti-government", im anti-corruption. If you watch the video it was the first words he said besides giving his credentials because he knew they would try to discredit him. Although, I may not have his credentials I am of sound mine and every word ive said in my reports are the truth.
Metropolitan Edison Company Reviews
This Defendant METROPOLITAN EDISON better known by MET-ED is being sued for conspiring with the police and fBI to break into my home, Violations in the 4th and 14th amendments of the constitution .As I said earlier on in my reports the FBI aren't as of yet named as a party to my Civil Action pending in the Appeals Court 2nd Department case no.(14-907).
Heres what they did , on the night of the last Tornado storm that we were effected by the power went out in my area for about 24hrs and then restored. At the time Saint Joseph hospital had denied me to see a doctor on two occasions. Heres what they did , they gave me an appointment a day or two later figuring I would be desperate to go and about 4 to 6 hours before the appointment cut the power off to drain my alarm back-up battery so the FBI would gain entry, in order to look for the tape Recorders. Since ,I was aware of what they were up to I stood home. I reported the outage to the public utility commission which investigated the complaint and the defendant responded that they do not know why the power went out again after it was restored. I was send this in writing by one of the workers there that did not much care for what they were doing but in fear blocked out her name from the report to avoid getting in trouble over it. Earlier on this week at 2:00 am they powered off the electricity again as intimidation for the last report I wrote.
Fraudulent ORDERS: In this part I want to discuss fraudulent orders, because they write them and try to make the public think its law or act as if they don’t know any better or just do it because prose litigants are supposed to be to dum to read and understand the interpretation of law.
Judge Mauskopf, what is a substantial Right, well here the Supreme court Stated that it has been definitely stated to bring up children is a substantial right under the 14th amendment.
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S.564(1972)"While this Court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty guaranteed [by the Fourteenth Amendment], the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint, but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privilege long recognized as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.
Fuller v. Fuller 13So.3d1108 (Fla.5th DCA 2009) the court stated: "If substantial evidence does not support the factual finds then the court abused its discretion, A parent has a constitutionally protected inherent right to a meaningful relationship with his or her children., and must be treated equally under all of the 4th 9th and 14th Amendments to the United States of America". "There is no reason to excuse the judiciary participating in depriving the parents of the care and custody time with their children.
So first, the Kings Family Court Judge deprives me of my child, in a strong arm attempt to force me into giving the court jurisdiction and now the district court is going to continue depriving me my child to force me into giving up my suit against the judge who alienated me from my son. How American is that!
Going back to the Appellate Courts decision to extend an order that the court lacked subject matter trial. If your read the order in my drop box you will notice these judges used the same fraudulent case made up by the lawyer and judge that framed me ,posted it online Richardson vs. Richardson,80 AD3d 32(2010)so the public would think it’s a real case to make it look like the judge's acts weren’t in bad faith in holding trial without jurisdiction, when it was a deliberate act to defraud. Don’t be fooled, its not a real case its made up to appear like there is a question over law. When the real question here is fraud, and more fraud. The judges that ordered this Skelos J.P.,Lott Roman and Laslle JJ.
Next the New York state court of Appeals, I called them to file an order to show cause to stay the Appellate courts order. They tell me that they don’t do order to show cause Exparte and I would have to serve the defendant first before sending it to the court. So after I go through the trouble as they instruct me they tell me the judge declined to sign the order. If you want to ask for a stay pending appeal your going to have to do it by motion. Now that they have the motion their telling me its going to take six to eight weeks to decide the motion.
Like I said in my previous report they all act in collusion. Lucky for me im not suing a Federal judge I surely be dead by now or being held in jail without trial like they did that attorney in California Richard Fine, made him a political prisoner for exploiting judicial corruption. It’s a shame because these parties give a bad name for the good law biding judges that are out there. Ive had my share of meeting both.
Article VI of the New York Constitution explicitly states process may executed in any part of the state. It don’t say in any state or country.
[Unified court system; organization; process]
Section 1. a. There shall be a unified court system for the state. The state-wide courts shall consist of the court of appeals, the supreme court including the appellate divisions thereof, the court of claims, the county court, the surrogate's court and the family court, as hereinafter provided. The legislature shall establish in and for the city of New York, as part of the unified court system for the state, a single, city-wide court of civil jurisdiction and a single, city-wide court of criminal jurisdiction, as hereinafter provided, and may upon the request of the mayor and the local legislative body of the city of New York, merge the two courts into one city-wide court of both civil and criminal jurisdiction. The unified court system for the state shall also include the district, town, city and village courts outside the city of New York, as hereinafter provided.
b. The court of appeals, the supreme court including the appellate divisions thereof, the court of claims, the county court, the surrogate's court, the family court, the courts or court of civil and criminal jurisdiction of the city of New York, and such other courts as the legislature may determine shall be courts of record.
c. All processes, warrants and other mandates of the court of appeals, the supreme court including the appellate divisions thereof, the court of claims, the county court, the surrogate's court and the family court may be served and executed in any part of the state. All processes, warrants and other mandates of the courts or court of civil and criminal jurisdiction of the city of New York may, subject to such limitation as may be prescribed by the legislature, be served and executed in any part of the state. The legislature may provide that processes, warrants and other mandates of the district court may be served and executed in any part of the state and that processes, warrants and other mandates of town, village and city courts outside the city of New York may be served and executed in any part of the county in which such courts are located or in any part of any adjoining county.
Title iii of the United States Constitution Section 2: in part states,The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed;
New York Family Court Act § 154. (c)(1) states, that the family court can issue a order protection so long as: (1) the act or acts giving rise to the application for issuance or enforcement of the order of protection occurred within the state.
So here you have the united states constitution and new York constitution and the family court act all states the courts jurisdiction is within the state and these four judges in New York are issuing orders of protections and holding trial for offenses alleged in Pennsylvania. Congress needs to take action again against these judges that break the law willfully, and they do it more so because I am Hispanic, with limited knowledge of the law and limited money to litigate. The truth be told they never expected I could write an appeal or represent myself in a court of law and now that they see I can its become a problem for them because of what I can prove in a court of law in front of a jury.
Lastly, im going to close this report with these last words. As the ex-chief Ted Gunderson of the FBI on you tube before talking about conspiracies "Im not anti-government", im anti-corruption. If you watch the video it was the first words he said besides giving his credentials because he knew they would try to discredit him. Although, I may not have his credentials I am of sound mine and every word ive said in my reports are the truth.