Complainant hillcrest media group The “complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements Each, a “statement” The author contended complainant breached a contract to market and distribute a book. The complainant acknowledged that the book was not distributed but offered to return a portion of the fee charged to the author and offered to distribute the book for free for two more years. The author did not submit a response to the complainant or any contact information.
In accordance with the rules, the arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
In this case, the arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the complainant to consider.
Each statement challenged by the complainant has been considered, together with any witness statements and documents provided by the complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the statement. The author did not provide a response to the complaint.
The arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the report were false. Therefore, according to the vip arbitration rules, those statements have been redacted.
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Hillcrest Media Group, Inc. Reviews
Complainant hillcrest media group The “complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements Each, a “statement” The author contended complainant breached a contract to market and distribute a book. The complainant acknowledged that the book was not distributed but offered to return a portion of the fee charged to the author and offered to distribute the book for free for two more years. The author did not submit a response to the complainant or any contact information.
In accordance with the rules, the arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
In this case, the arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the complainant to consider.
Each statement challenged by the complainant has been considered, together with any witness statements and documents provided by the complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the statement. The author did not provide a response to the complaint.
The arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the report were false. Therefore, according to the vip arbitration rules, those statements have been redacted.
Decided may 8th, 2014
Bruce e. Meyerson, arbitrator
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.