I am currently suing Bill Gwire for fraud. It is at least the 21st time Gwire has been sued, including by at least TEN former clients. If you would like to review these cases, many can be found at www.sfsuperiorcourt.org/online-services. Mine is case #510305.
Gwire has not only been sued by at least ten former clients, but also by his own former law firm, an employee, his co-counsel, his predecessor counsel, an expert witness, and three other legal service providers, among others.
*Note: In at least one case, Gwire has explicitly demanded arbitration to avoid a public record, writing the attorney of the person suing him: “Your filing has now created a public record of an action against me which the arbitration provision was intended to avoid.” (SF Case #506498, in which an expert witness sued Gwire). Gwire then threatened to seek sanctions against the attorney, unless the case was moved to arbitration. This information is known only because, when the arbitrator ruled that Gwire must pay the plaintiff over $120,000, Gwire argued - in Court - that the arbitration was improper (the Court disagreed). In my opinion, Gwire’s efforts to avoid “public record of an action against [himself]” begs the question of how many cases against Gwire can’t be found because he succeeded.*
I have previously posted a complaint about Gwire, but took it down after he made a series of serious threats, discussed below, and sued me for defamation (also case #510305). However, I am posting again because (among other reasons) I have learned more about his history, which leads me to believe he is likely to harm other innocent people.
Gwire Law Offices Reviews
I am currently suing Bill Gwire for fraud. It is at least the 21st time Gwire has been sued, including by at least TEN former clients. If you would like to review these cases, many can be found at www.sfsuperiorcourt.org/online-services. Mine is case #510305.
Gwire has not only been sued by at least ten former clients, but also by his own former law firm, an employee, his co-counsel, his predecessor counsel, an expert witness, and three other legal service providers, among others.
*Note: In at least one case, Gwire has explicitly demanded arbitration to avoid a public record, writing the attorney of the person suing him: “Your filing has now created a public record of an action against me which the arbitration provision was intended to avoid.” (SF Case #506498, in which an expert witness sued Gwire). Gwire then threatened to seek sanctions against the attorney, unless the case was moved to arbitration. This information is known only because, when the arbitrator ruled that Gwire must pay the plaintiff over $120,000, Gwire argued - in Court - that the arbitration was improper (the Court disagreed). In my opinion, Gwire’s efforts to avoid “public record of an action against [himself]” begs the question of how many cases against Gwire can’t be found because he succeeded.*
I have previously posted a complaint about Gwire, but took it down after he made a series of serious threats, discussed below, and sued me for defamation (also case #510305). However, I am posting again because (among other reasons) I have learned more about his history, which leads me to believe he is likely to harm other innocent people.