The complaints were posted by a third party who wanted the public to have negative information about goren. Most of the claims were dismissed because of immunity granted to websites under the communications decency act, a federal law which gives immunity to websites that host content written by third parties. Goren attempted to use legal process to take the copyrights for the complaints away from the author and the website operator, but the massachusetts federal court found goren’s attempts to take the copyrights were illegal and invalid. Stating that goren could not show that he had been harmed by the website’s vip arbitration program, nor the corporate advocacy program.
To read the complete summary of judgment click the links below;
There was no presumption of innocence on the part of Special Agent Vileta. He made up his mind early on that Tracey was a con, and he ignored all of the evidence in front of him that Michael had a history of domestic and child abuse, and had already implicated himself with his failed polygraph test. Instead he focused on an argument Tracey had with John Pitman and other events in her past that in his mind made her a dishonest fraud. Vileta no doubt talked in this manner to the new county prosecutor and Ben caught the bug of biased opinion. And this rigid view of Tracey took root early on in Ben Smiths mind and it came out in his conversation with Mary Higgins. From his reaction to Marys admission she knew about a notebook, it was evident hed lost his perspective on Traceys possible innocence, and could not presume any longer that she could be innocent. And did Tracey get a fair trial when the prosecution put an alleged liar and town gossip on the stand, Mary Higgins. She lied about who she heard about the notebook from, and her lie overshadowed the eye-witness account of a frightened eleven year old. Because thats how Ben Smith impugned the testimony of a 21-year-old Bert Pitman, by taking his testimony as a frightened kid ten years before and compared it line for line, and parsing words and making him out to be a liar by saying he didnt hear what he heard when he said his mother was attacked and nearly strangled to death. The other eye witness (Noah Roberts) forced to live with his abusive father, ironically placed in witness protection along with his sister Mason with the very person they needed protection from their father. Strategically it was a brilliant move for the young prosecutor because witness protection removed the other eye-witness to the attack and made it impossible for Michael to be served. The hacking code which allows jury tampering was utilized in this trial, but how many others? Is this the very reason for the Prosecutors Office to have allowed all of this to happen? The hacking scandal continues to rock the U.K., but many of the same players are allegedly involved with Mile2 and Michael Roberts. And all this injustice has rolled down on the shoulders of Tracey Richter, and she sits in cement cell, behind bars, for the rest of her life for something she didnt do.
On September 19, 2014, Ripoff Report / Xcentric Ventures filed a Motion to Disqualify County Attorney Ben Smith from the lawsuit he filed seeking an order to take information down from the RipoffReport.com website.
The Motion to Disqualify is supported by a brief explaining the conflict of interest that disqualifies Smith from being the attorney on the case. The lawsuit is taking place in Sac County, Iowa, where Ben Smith is the County Attorney and the only public prosecutor.
Essentially, the brief states Smith’s performance as a public prosecutor is criticized in postings on the RipoffReport.com website, and Smith has a conflict of interest when he sues (or prosecutes) people for posting things that criticize him. A different and neutral attorney would need to do that, otherwise Smith is using the power of his office to serve his personal interest instead of the public interest.
“It is important that an elected public prosecutor cannot be able to use the official power of his office to prosecute, persecute, silence or suppress criticism from the public. Otherwise he could just put all of his political opponents in jail, and there would be no freedom of speech or the press,” said Adam Kunz, Xcentric's COO and In House Counsel.
Ed Magedson Reviews
The complaints were posted by a third party who wanted the public to have negative information about goren. Most of the claims were dismissed because of immunity granted to websites under the communications decency act, a federal law which gives immunity to websites that host content written by third parties. Goren attempted to use legal process to take the copyrights for the complaints away from the author and the website operator, but the massachusetts federal court found goren’s attempts to take the copyrights were illegal and invalid. Stating that goren could not show that he had been harmed by the website’s vip arbitration program, nor the corporate advocacy program.
To read the complete summary of judgment click the links below;
There was no presumption of innocence on the part of Special Agent Vileta. He made up his mind early on that Tracey was a con, and he ignored all of the evidence in front of him that Michael had a history of domestic and child abuse, and had already implicated himself with his failed polygraph test. Instead he focused on an argument Tracey had with John Pitman and other events in her past that in his mind made her a dishonest fraud. Vileta no doubt talked in this manner to the new county prosecutor and Ben caught the bug of biased opinion. And this rigid view of Tracey took root early on in Ben Smiths mind and it came out in his conversation with Mary Higgins. From his reaction to Marys admission she knew about a notebook, it was evident hed lost his perspective on Traceys possible innocence, and could not presume any longer that she could be innocent. And did Tracey get a fair trial when the prosecution put an alleged liar and town gossip on the stand, Mary Higgins. She lied about who she heard about the notebook from, and her lie overshadowed the eye-witness account of a frightened eleven year old. Because thats how Ben Smith impugned the testimony of a 21-year-old Bert Pitman, by taking his testimony as a frightened kid ten years before and compared it line for line, and parsing words and making him out to be a liar by saying he didnt hear what he heard when he said his mother was attacked and nearly strangled to death. The other eye witness (Noah Roberts) forced to live with his abusive father, ironically placed in witness protection along with his sister Mason with the very person they needed protection from their father. Strategically it was a brilliant move for the young prosecutor because witness protection removed the other eye-witness to the attack and made it impossible for Michael to be served. The hacking code which allows jury tampering was utilized in this trial, but how many others? Is this the very reason for the Prosecutors Office to have allowed all of this to happen? The hacking scandal continues to rock the U.K., but many of the same players are allegedly involved with Mile2 and Michael Roberts. And all this injustice has rolled down on the shoulders of Tracey Richter, and she sits in cement cell, behind bars, for the rest of her life for something she didnt do.
On September 19, 2014, Ripoff Report / Xcentric Ventures filed a Motion to Disqualify County Attorney Ben Smith from the lawsuit he filed seeking an order to take information down from the RipoffReport.com website.
The Motion to Disqualify is supported by a brief explaining the conflict of interest that disqualifies Smith from being the attorney on the case. The lawsuit is taking place in Sac County, Iowa, where Ben Smith is the County Attorney and the only public prosecutor.
Essentially, the brief states Smith’s performance as a public prosecutor is criticized in postings on the RipoffReport.com website, and Smith has a conflict of interest when he sues (or prosecutes) people for posting things that criticize him. A different and neutral attorney would need to do that, otherwise Smith is using the power of his office to serve his personal interest instead of the public interest.
“It is important that an elected public prosecutor cannot be able to use the official power of his office to prosecute, persecute, silence or suppress criticism from the public. Otherwise he could just put all of his political opponents in jail, and there would be no freedom of speech or the press,” said Adam Kunz, Xcentric's COO and In House Counsel.