I wish to reiterate that I believe that all comments contained in this report and applicable to my statement regarding this matter are fair, accurate and reasonable. No money was transferred to Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas or her business from me.
I was considering investing in one of this person's programmes for either myself and a friend, or just for one of us until 2nd September, 2014. As at writing this, I am considering my legal options and Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas has previously been sent an e-mail accordingly. As at writing this, there has been no offer by Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas to retract the applicable statement.
Denise Duffield-Thomas claimed on 2nd September, 2014 (in part), "...cheerocracy," yet I am left wondering as to the accuracy of this terminology given the following:
An open letter to a certain Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas (aka Lucky Bitch)
Whilst perhaps not on the scale of, "...scamming...," I do have to wonder why Denise Duffield-Thomas would include this on her Facebook timeline (in part) from, https://www.facebook.com/dduffieldthomas, accessed online 2nd September, 2014"
"I just banned a Debbie Downer from my page. She wasn't abusive or even a troll, but she commented on EVERY SINGLE thing with a DD comment. Honestly, I just got over seeing it every time I looked at my page.
Got someone like that?!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJ_R-G_i4Xk"
This was followed up (in response to someone else's comment):
"Denise Duffield-Thomas I do feel sorry for her, but this has been going on for too long. She's not abusive or mean in any way, but she always sees the negative, and I want to keep this place a positive energy space."
So, I am going to state this:
MsDenise Duffield-Thomas, I note that part-way through 2nd September, 2014, I was unable to comment after I responded to a post on your Facebook page wherein you asked, "What would you like to change about your life today?" My response was (similar to), "Not being a doormat." This comment was liked by Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas before I was banned from commenting on her Facebook page. Hence, my right of reply needs to be done outside of her Facebook page.
Fair enough, it is your Facebook page and Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas is required to ensure that you are in full adherence of all of Facebook's requirements - and legislations.
A process of elimination should enable any reasonable person to determine who the person that claimed to ban was, right?
I am also reminding you that I have posted certain comments that were well received by you - including that I will be virtually attending next week's Artful Business Conference. I understand that you will be a guest speaker there. Hopefully, you will not embellish the truth at this conference.
I would also like to remind Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas that a certain statements made on Denise Duffield-Thomas's Facebook page were not only supported by me, but were extended further. In addition, I posted numerous positive comments which were also liked by Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas.
Denise Duffield-Thomas, you are also an author and have written at least one article involving the comment, "Lucky Bitch." Do you think still think that? What is your stance on embellishing the truth? Can you prove that someone got banned because of your claim? Is there a motive for making the claim that you have not (as at writing this) provided corroborating evidence to/for/of?
There was a reason why I did not previously join your program - I was uncertain about whether I would be enrolling one of my friends and I at the same time. As it stands, neither will be enrolled in any of your ventures.
If you are of the religious persuasion, I offer:
"Matthew 19:18
"Which ones?" he inquired. Jesus replied, "'You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony,""
Incidentally, I am usually a fun, bright, vibrant person. However, you posed a question that I responded to correctly this morning and I am not a human doormat.
p.s. Your Facebook page is not the first one that I have been banned from commenting on, I take it in my stride. What concerns me is the comment shortly thereafter on Denise Duffield-Thomas's Facebook page and how many people might believe the disseminated story and possible fallout regarding and for the person you wrote about in the applicable comment. Did you think about this before commenting given there are over 9,000 likers on your Facebook page?
I have since sent an e-mail to Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas in response. As at writing this, I have received only a generic reply advising that responses can take 2 days. As at 7:30am AEST on 5th September, 2014, the aforementioned comment still appeared on the Facebook page of, “Public Figure," Denise Duffield-Thomas.
Denise Duffield-Thomas Reviews
I wish to reiterate that I believe that all comments contained in this report and applicable to my statement regarding this matter are fair, accurate and reasonable. No money was transferred to Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas or her business from me.
I was considering investing in one of this person's programmes for either myself and a friend, or just for one of us until 2nd September, 2014. As at writing this, I am considering my legal options and Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas has previously been sent an e-mail accordingly. As at writing this, there has been no offer by Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas to retract the applicable statement.
Denise Duffield-Thomas claimed on 2nd September, 2014 (in part), "...cheerocracy," yet I am left wondering as to the accuracy of this terminology given the following:
An open letter to a certain Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas (aka Lucky Bitch)
Whilst perhaps not on the scale of, "...scamming...," I do have to wonder why Denise Duffield-Thomas would include this on her Facebook timeline (in part) from, https://www.facebook.com/dduffieldthomas, accessed online 2nd September, 2014"
"I just banned a Debbie Downer from my page. She wasn't abusive or even a troll, but she commented on EVERY SINGLE thing with a DD comment. Honestly, I just got over seeing it every time I looked at my page.
Got someone like that?!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJ_R-G_i4Xk"
This was followed up (in response to someone else's comment):
"Denise Duffield-Thomas I do feel sorry for her, but this has been going on for too long. She's not abusive or mean in any way, but she always sees the negative, and I want to keep this place a positive energy space."
So, I am going to state this:
MsDenise Duffield-Thomas, I note that part-way through 2nd September, 2014, I was unable to comment after I responded to a post on your Facebook page wherein you asked, "What would you like to change about your life today?" My response was (similar to), "Not being a doormat." This comment was liked by Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas before I was banned from commenting on her Facebook page. Hence, my right of reply needs to be done outside of her Facebook page.
Fair enough, it is your Facebook page and Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas is required to ensure that you are in full adherence of all of Facebook's requirements - and legislations.
A process of elimination should enable any reasonable person to determine who the person that claimed to ban was, right?
I am also reminding you that I have posted certain comments that were well received by you - including that I will be virtually attending next week's Artful Business Conference. I understand that you will be a guest speaker there. Hopefully, you will not embellish the truth at this conference.
I would also like to remind Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas that a certain statements made on Denise Duffield-Thomas's Facebook page were not only supported by me, but were extended further. In addition, I posted numerous positive comments which were also liked by Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas.
Denise Duffield-Thomas, you are also an author and have written at least one article involving the comment, "Lucky Bitch." Do you think still think that? What is your stance on embellishing the truth? Can you prove that someone got banned because of your claim? Is there a motive for making the claim that you have not (as at writing this) provided corroborating evidence to/for/of?
There was a reason why I did not previously join your program - I was uncertain about whether I would be enrolling one of my friends and I at the same time. As it stands, neither will be enrolled in any of your ventures.
If you are of the religious persuasion, I offer:
"Matthew 19:18
"Which ones?" he inquired. Jesus replied, "'You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony,""
Incidentally, I am usually a fun, bright, vibrant person. However, you posed a question that I responded to correctly this morning and I am not a human doormat.
p.s. Your Facebook page is not the first one that I have been banned from commenting on, I take it in my stride. What concerns me is the comment shortly thereafter on Denise Duffield-Thomas's Facebook page and how many people might believe the disseminated story and possible fallout regarding and for the person you wrote about in the applicable comment. Did you think about this before commenting given there are over 9,000 likers on your Facebook page?
I have since sent an e-mail to Ms Denise Duffield-Thomas in response. As at writing this, I have received only a generic reply advising that responses can take 2 days. As at 7:30am AEST on 5th September, 2014, the aforementioned comment still appeared on the Facebook page of, “Public Figure," Denise Duffield-Thomas.