Cst went to trial against me in 2012 regarding their unreliable product, disgaceful customer service, and blatant misrepresentation of product performance. This was a jury trial, a jury Dave Arringdale insisted upon, and the conclusion of that jury resulted in a verdict against cst, which one would think would prompt cst to make more accurate statements about them and their faulty product and even worse service. Now here we are nearly two years later and their website still contains absolute false and misleading statements, so this is my reccomendation to anyone who feels victimized by these horrible excuses for human decency. Get a lawyer and sue them, sue them for every dime paid to them and costs incurred by their arrogant attitude. Their device was proven to give false positive readings , and can be influenced by atmospheric conditions, so it can be argued that you chose their product based on false and or misleading information presented by them, and therefore are entitled to a full refund, plus any other damages you can prove. Clients and attorneys are encouraged to access my file in Springfield Ma district court in which Arringdale"s engineer admitted that device can read false positives, for any number of reasons. Do not tolerate these a holes,,, teach them a lesson in decency,
Consumer Safety Technology Reviews
Cst went to trial against me in 2012 regarding their unreliable product, disgaceful customer service, and blatant misrepresentation of product performance. This was a jury trial, a jury Dave Arringdale insisted upon, and the conclusion of that jury resulted in a verdict against cst, which one would think would prompt cst to make more accurate statements about them and their faulty product and even worse service. Now here we are nearly two years later and their website still contains absolute false and misleading statements, so this is my reccomendation to anyone who feels victimized by these horrible excuses for human decency. Get a lawyer and sue them, sue them for every dime paid to them and costs incurred by their arrogant attitude. Their device was proven to give false positive readings , and can be influenced by atmospheric conditions, so it can be argued that you chose their product based on false and or misleading information presented by them, and therefore are entitled to a full refund, plus any other damages you can prove. Clients and attorneys are encouraged to access my file in Springfield Ma district court in which Arringdale"s engineer admitted that device can read false positives, for any number of reasons. Do not tolerate these a holes,,, teach them a lesson in decency,